• Home
  • Services
    • Content Creation
    • Market Research
    • Strategy
  • Videos
  • About Us
    • The Company
    • Contact Us
  • Content Marketing
  • Around the Web
    • Channel Insights
    • Digital transformation
    • CQ Originals
    • UCC
    • Vertical Markets
  • Home
  • Services
    • Content Creation
    • Market Research
    • Strategy
  • Videos
  • About Us
    • The Company
    • Contact Us
  • Content Marketing
  • Around the Web
    • Channel Insights
    • Digital transformation
    • CQ Originals
    • UCC
    • Vertical Markets

How Government Is Reforming IT Procurment and What It Means for Vendors

Around the Web,Vertical Markets
/
April 12, 2017

The way state and local government buys technology is changing. But how?

by Ben Miller / April 6, 2017

government IT procurement

Flexibility. If there’s one thing that everybody involved in government procurement — chief information officers, procurement officials, vendors and civic tech folk — appear to agree on, it’s that the future of government’s technology-buying should be more flexible.

The trend in that direction seems well underway too. Consider, implores longtime public-sector IT specialist Sherry Amos, the cloud.

“I’ve seen a maturity in the last five years, maturity not only of acceptance of cloud solutions but of [the] necessity of cloud solutions, not only for cost containment but because fundamentally it’s the only way to use certain solutions,” said Amos, the managing director of industry strategy for education and government at Workday.

And the cloud, even more than traditional government tech work, is a kind of symbol of flexibility. The whole software-as-a-service model is built around the concept of buying something available over the air instead of installed via disk; purchased through subscription as opposed to bought outright; updated weekly rather than released in a new version every year.

The cloud isn’t the only driver here. Government technology procurement is, in the timelines of the digital age, an ancient quagmire. The process differs from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, but generally goes something like this: Agency X has a tech need. It spends a really, really long time trying to write down its needs in a request for proposal. It requires vendors to take on as much risk as possible in the process. The vendor gets a massive check and a deadline, often a year or longer depending on the system, to deliver the goods.

Everybody has something bad to say about this approach. It takes too long. It costs too much. It favors the entrenched tech giants over innovative smaller players. It delivers products that users find difficult to navigate. It props up a paradigm of slow replacement cycles resulting in legacy systems that become more difficult to keep running over time. The list goes on.

So how are state and local governments working to create a better system?

Read the full story at govtech.com - How Government Is Reforming IT Procurement and What It Means for Vendors

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

From Twitter
  • Brand stories work when they go beyond products and services, says @DennisShiao via @cmicontent. #CMWorld Content… https://t.co/eVkVr4LcDV
    December 12, 2019
  • Brands will start customizing #content for individual audiences and applications, says @tamadear via @cmicontent.… https://t.co/ci9iPQMUrc
    December 10, 2019
  • This all-electric airplane is flew the first commercial test flight of its kind today in #Vancouver. https://t.co/TC6tLKHvHp
    December 10, 2019
Vertical Markets
  • Retail
Around the World
  • Channel Insights
  • Content Marketing
  • Digital transformation
  • Press releases
  • UCC
  • CQ Originals